|
|
Back Accessories: Related Items: Binding: Health and Beauty Brand: Armani EAN: 3360372100522 Ingredients: 'Fresh lemon and bergamot softened with hints of orange tree blossom, warmed with soothing Guaiac wood, and Tonka Bean.' Label: Giorgio Armani Manufacturer: Giorgio Armani Model: 139105 Number Of Items: 1 Publisher: Giorgio Armani Release Date: 2005-11-02 Size: 2.5 oz Studio: Giorgio Armani Features:
Rating: - I love thisThis perfume is just great, the smell is just awesome. All my friends like it. Rating: - Armani codeExcellent perfume! I liked the subtle smell of this one very much. I got positive feedback from others whenver I wore this perfume. Rating: - Great Cologne!I recently purchased several colognes to see which would be best recieved for my upcoming music school interviews. Along with Code, I also purchased Drakkar Noir, Curve and Polo. Although I like Drakkar, The Code lasts longer and has a more memorable scent to it. In addition, while Code is a popular cologne, Drakkar is exponentially more popular and quite overused, I might add. I did like the Curve, but while it is attractive, it does not seem sophisticated at all - more of a teenager's cologne for casual wear. I did not like the Polo at all. I've tested this cologne at work and have recieved plenty of positive comments from my co-workers to convince me that Armani Code is the right choice. Rating: - The best perfume I have ever brought!!Usually I buying perfumes for only increasing my collection. After buying this one I think I won`t buy any perfume again except it. Very Very good one, the smell of it is different and put you in another world! Rating: - GreatI just love the scent of Armani Code. It is not overpowering, but is definitely noticeably in close proximity. I only spray once and that is usually enough. Also, the scent does last a long time. |
Ted Shelton: "Frankly I felt that BlogOn was a waste of time and money."
I think the BlogOn conference was overproduced. In the name of professionalism the organizing firm turned off potential speakers, oversubscribed sponsors, etc.
I would have liked a debatable topic (aside from *blogging = journalism*. Two people slugging it out. Or a devil's advocate taking challenges from the floor.
I would have liked more hard numbers. Facts. Charts. Diagrams. We have the analytic tools to BS-check them; harder on vague opinions and single-points-of-observation.
I found it disturbing how much money was being commanded (from both attendees and sponsors) for a conference at a university. Maybe it was because it was at Berkeley? Maybe we should have taken over a community college or a Cal State or a DeVry. The facilities costs would have been cheaper at least. I heard an organizer apologize and say the next one would be at a hotel, like that would have been better.
Cost wasn't the whole problem. We're at a stage where early adopters are meeting folks who want to leap the chasm. Huge gaps in knowledge, experience, context, culture, vocabulary. It's the gap.
There are huge ideas to be explored, even in the world of applying blogs to media strategy and the enterprise. And most of the big ideas weren't even on the agenda at BlogOn. Probably because it was catering to those who want to commercialize, fund, and otherwise exploit (excuse me, "get in on") the emerging medium.
Let's fork these conferences so advanced topics on business and technology and culture fit the participants.
Twits du Jour