|
|
Back Accessories: Related Items: Binding: Health and Beauty Brand: Remington EAN: 0074590816600 Label: Remington Manufacturer: Remington Model: WDF-7000CS Publisher: Remington Release Date: 2005-04-15 Studio: Remington Features:
Rating: - Best razor ever!!!!I have had mine for a little over 2 years and it has never failed to amaze me on the closeness of the shave. I have extremely sensitive skin and have never experienced pain or pulling of the hairs. Being fair complected i am prone to razor bumps from conventional razors and since using this I not only get a "smooth and silky" shave but razor bumps are a thing of the past. I am disappointed than the super store by me has discontinued the replacement blades from their stock but was happy to see it here at amazon. The cleaning mose is great just hit a button and go. If the noise "more like humming" bothers you just fininh your business in the room and hit the button on your way out. Personally ... Read More Rating: - Remington WDF-7000Works as expected. Like it very much but the cleaning is a bit noisy. Other than that I really like it - saves a lot of time over the old wet shaving. Rating: - Smooth ShaverThis is the best ladies shaver I've ever used. I highly recommend this shaver. Rating: - RemingtonI am on my 4th shaver and even bought new components for current one. Not smooth and not enough charge. Dies after less than 2 minutes. Won't buy Remington again. Rating: - Don't do it!I've had my razor for more than a year now. The rubber edges near the blades tear easiy; I don't really know what purpose they serve. The cleaning fluid is expensive and evaporates quickly. Also, the metal parts inside the fluid reservoir are rusting! I've never used water in the reservoir, only cleaning fluid. The noise during the cleaning really doesn't bother me, but I do wish that the shaver got cleaner than it does. When cleaning is complete, hair is still on the ouside of the unit. |
Ted Shelton: "Frankly I felt that BlogOn was a waste of time and money."
I think the BlogOn conference was overproduced. In the name of professionalism the organizing firm turned off potential speakers, oversubscribed sponsors, etc.
I would have liked a debatable topic (aside from *blogging = journalism*. Two people slugging it out. Or a devil's advocate taking challenges from the floor.
I would have liked more hard numbers. Facts. Charts. Diagrams. We have the analytic tools to BS-check them; harder on vague opinions and single-points-of-observation.
I found it disturbing how much money was being commanded (from both attendees and sponsors) for a conference at a university. Maybe it was because it was at Berkeley? Maybe we should have taken over a community college or a Cal State or a DeVry. The facilities costs would have been cheaper at least. I heard an organizer apologize and say the next one would be at a hotel, like that would have been better.
Cost wasn't the whole problem. We're at a stage where early adopters are meeting folks who want to leap the chasm. Huge gaps in knowledge, experience, context, culture, vocabulary. It's the gap.
There are huge ideas to be explored, even in the world of applying blogs to media strategy and the enterprise. And most of the big ideas weren't even on the agenda at BlogOn. Probably because it was catering to those who want to commercialize, fund, and otherwise exploit (excuse me, "get in on") the emerging medium.
Let's fork these conferences so advanced topics on business and technology and culture fit the participants.
Twits du Jour